Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

2014 High class 1795

1. On July 25, 2014, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by “D” in the “D” page in the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, on July 25, 2014, even though there was no fact that the victim E (the age of 25) had the Defendant’s wife and the French body, the Defendant, despite the fact that the victim’s wife was the Defendant’s wife (the age of 28) and two other customers (the age of 28) and 10 customers.”

2. On July 31, 2014, at around 22:25, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts, while the Defendant was in dispute with the wife G at the same place as Paragraph 1, even though the victim did not have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to keep the house, and even though he was 19 years of age, the Defendant had to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to maintain the house, and to have to have to have to have to have it to have it to have it maintained.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, E, and G;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to witness statements of I and J;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse

1. Regarding the summary of the argument, as the victim was in a de facto in infinite relationship with E, the Defendant’s oral statement is not false, but the Defendant’s oral statement at the time is merely H, and H has no possibility of spreading as a car page employee of the victim.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court as to whether the facts are false, i.e., the victim and E are in incompetence relationship.