1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 21,127,137; and (b) KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them, from October 14, 2012 to September 14, 2015.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition (1) around 04:59 on October 14, 2012, C driven a D vehicle and sent a signal at the road intersection near Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-Road, followed the left-hand bridge of the Plaintiff A, who dried the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signal, while driving in violation of the signal. As a result, the Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as the satisfaction 1, 2, 3, and 4 middle-water copis on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (2) Plaintiff B is an infant of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is a mutual aid project operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the said vehicle.

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3 (if there is a tentative number, including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(3) No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

2. The current price shall be calculated at the time of the accident of the scope of the damage compensation liability shall be calculated by the simple interest rate calculated by deducting intermediate interest at the rate of 5/12 per month, and the amount less than 10 won for the convenience of the calculation shall be discarded.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

A) It is difficult to recognize that the blood transfusion from the time of the instant accident occurred due to the use of the medicine for the injury, and thus, it is not recognized as the king treatment expenses.

B. The future treatment costs (A) requires KRW 3,090,000 to cover the cost of removing metal fixed on the border of the next large frame. It is deemed that the said money is paid on the day following the date of the closing of argument in this case.

2,706,531 won (3,090,000 x 0.8759) calculated at the present price at the time of the accident is recognized as future treatment costs.

However, sex surgery expenses shall not be recognized.

C. The plaintiff A was given treatment, such as static surgery and internal surgery, on the left-hand side and the right-hand side of the instant accident. The plaintiff A was in need of care in the process of surgery and recovery.