1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 215,309,832 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 2,000,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 1,00,000,000 to Plaintiff C, D, and E, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 05:42 on Nov. 6, 2009, the F driven a G car (hereinafter “Defendant car”) with a blood alcohol level of 0.165%, and was driven in violation of the signal from the shock distance in the Hansung-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, F shocked the I car for H driver’s vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) left left to the left according to the straight line.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

In the instant accident, Plaintiff A, who was accompanied by the head of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, suffered injury, such as the ethical frame, the left-hand ethal bones, and the ethical frame of the ethical ethal, and the ethic ethic ethic eth

C. Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C, D, and E are the children of Plaintiff A’s husband, and the Defendant is the insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance for the Defendant’s automobile.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 10-1 through 7, Eul evidence 10-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case which occurred during the operation of the defendant's automobile as the insurer of this case.

The defendant asserts that the defendant's responsibility should be limited to not more than 80% since the plaintiff A appears to have failed to wear a safety bell in light of the fact that the plaintiff A's injury part is an inner part, but there is no evidence to support that the plaintiff A did not wear a safety bell.

The defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In principle, the period for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than won shall be discarded, and the current value at the time of the accident shall be calculated by deducting the interim interest at the rate of 5/12 percent per month.

The arguments of the parties, which are not indicated below, shall be dismissed.

(1) lost income.