1. The defendant's appeal against the plaintiff B is dismissed.

2. The defendant's appeal against the plaintiff A is dismissed.

3...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the deletion of the part of 3. A in the column of reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance and addition of the part of 3. A in the part of 3. A in addition to adding the following 2.

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. An appeal as to whether the Defendant’s appeal against the Plaintiff B is lawful may be filed only against the judgment that is disadvantageous to the appellant himself/herself, and whether the judgment is disadvantageous to the appellant should be determined at the time of the filing of the appeal based on the text of the judgment, and as such, the appeal against the entire winning judgment is unlawful as there is no benefit.

I would like to say.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Da20235 Decided July 13, 2007, etc.). In the instant case, the Health Unit Plaintiffs filed a claim against the Defendant as stated in the purport of the claim in the first instance trial, but the Defendant’s claim against the Defendant was dismissed, and the Defendant’s entire winning of the claim against the Plaintiff B is obvious in the record, and thus, the Defendant’s appeal against the Plaintiff B is unlawful as there is no benefit of appeal.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal against the plaintiff Eul is dismissed as it is unlawful, and the plaintiff's claim is accepted as reasonable, and the part against the plaintiff Eul among the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal against the plaintiff Eul is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.