logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.06.12 2018나62454
유류대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against defendant D is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's defendant B, C, E, F, G, H, and K.

Reasons

1. An appeal as to whether an appeal against Defendant D is lawful may be filed only against a judgment unfavorable to himself/herself, and an appeal against the judgment that won the entire winning case is unlawful as there is no benefit.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Da20235 Decided July 13, 2007, etc.). The first instance court fully accepted the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant D Co., Ltd.

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s appeal against Defendant D is unlawful as there is no benefit from appeal.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of this court on the remaining claims against the Defendants is the same as that of the above Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendant D is dismissed, and all appeals against the remaining defendants are dismissed.

arrow