logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.04.22 2015고정18
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, around 15:00 on October 3, 2014, driven by CNDD ADD on a car with a wife D, and proceeds as two-lanes from the four-lanes of the way in which the Bacheon Tlcheon Road is left left to the right to the right from the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the path of peace from the right to the west.

They turn to the right at the intersection of the accident points.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to safely drive the signal in accordance with the signals and the right and the right and the right of the signal.

Nevertheless, due to negligence in violation of the signal, the full part of the Fone Star Cargo in the victim E (the 69-year-old driver) drive under the new subparagraph was received as the front door of the vehicle driven by the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, who is a driver of the victimized vehicle, including approximately two weeks of unknown brain rash, the injury that there is no two open wound, the injury to the victim G (n, 71 years of age) on board the damaged vehicle, the injury of chest strings, etc. which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, the injury of the victim H (n, 45 years of age), and the injury of the victim H (n, 69 years of age), including about six (6) weeks of treatment on the part of the defendant's vehicle, and about six (6) years of age, including four (69 years of age) or more of the catus catus that require more than six (6) weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow