beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty
Reasons
1. The Defendants in the facts charged of this case, together with the victims C and the victims D, had been working for the members E building in Ansan-si, and the insurance designer in the third floor as the insurance designer, and the victims G is the victims C insurance customer.
1. Defendant A
A. On December 2015, the Defendant was deprived of the status of the head of the team due to the victim C at the meeting room for the first police officer, and the victim C.
I think that the rest of the victim is not good for the victim, and that fact is that the victim C did not have a bad relation with the victim D, who is a workplace ward, but H, who is a workplace ward, conducted licking to glick back the C.
The phrase “the secretary of the B team leader working in the same office has an improper relationship with D,” and the victim C and the victim D damaged the reputation by openly pointing out false facts.
B. On December 2015, the Defendant: (a) around F1st century, to F1st century; and (b) even though the victims did not have inhumane relationship, “C and B’s secret D are inappropriate relationships.
C is an improper relation with the beauty room president G, and is using money.
G “To enter into an insurance contract with excessive inappropriate relations for its people by introducing female customers,” thereby impairing the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.
(c)
The Defendant was a past worker in Ansan-si J building and fourth floor K at Ansan-si from February 2, 2016 to March 2016.
L. The facts are between L. L., even though the victims did not have a bad character relationship, “C is between the cosmetic G of the beauty room.”
B, such as B B's B's visa D, B set aside D.
C It is possible for C to attach L if we drinked only once L Dobed L
The term "the victims had damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts."
2. Defendant B: (a) around January 2016, at the above F3th floor office, Defendant B had a workplace partner H; and (b) even if the victim C did not have a inhumane relationship with the victim D, a workplace partner.