logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.14 2013가단77748
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for lost income and consolation money shall be dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s KRW 38,083,258 and the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff was waiting for a bus in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City on December 15:20, 197 and around December 15:20, 197. However, the Plaintiff was waiting for a bus in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant vehicle”). However, the Plaintiff’s B bus owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

) An accident involving the Plaintiff’s body with the rear rear wheels without finding the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Plaintiff suffered injury to the Dogdo damage accompanied by the pelvis and the pelvis, due to the instant accident. (2) After that, the Plaintiff’s surgery and diagnosis details are as follows.

On July 22, 1978, 1978, the surgery on July 26, 21978, 1978, following 100 Domination and Domination surgery on September 21, 31978; 4 November 9, 1978, 500 Domination surgery on February 13, 1979; 70 Domination and Domination surgery on June 7, 1979, following the Domination and Domination surgery on September 28, 1978. 198 Domination surgery on September 13, 1978, following the Domination and Domination surgery on June 28, 1978. 198 Domination and Domination surgery on June 13, 1978

B. On May 15, 1979, the Plaintiff’s father C agreed with the Defendant as follows with respect to the instant accident.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement”). Since the victim of the instant accident paid 1.7 million won to the victim of the instant accident as consolation money and damages, mutual agreement was reached, it would not thereafter raise any objection thereto, and would not bring any civil or criminal lawsuit.

o Medical expenses shall be borne by the defendant in the event of legacy due to the instant accident

(including a part of a sex surgery).

After that, on April 28, 198, the Plaintiff’s medical history Nos. 1 and the name of diagnosis, and on April 28, 198, the operation conducted on January 201, 2013 following the diagnosis before blood-related donation, which was conducted through the culpivity test and the diagnosis before blood-related donation.

arrow