A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

At around 13:20 on December 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) within the “E” operated by Cheongju-si C Victim D; (b) the victim D (here, 49 years of age) and her husband was aware of the fact that her husband was a party to the relationship with her husband; (c) the victim was found to be the head of the customer who found the beauty room; and (d) the victim was found to have a defect in her fling, but (e) the victim was the victim, who was unable to engage in her fling, but there was no reason to talk about her husband.

“A request for eviction was made three times in written form.”

However, the Defendant did not comply with the Defendant’s request to leave the beauty room on the ground that the Defendant did not speak the victim, but did not respond to the request of the victim on the ground that it would be bad for him to go out of the beauty room, and around 13:55 on the same day, and the police officers dispatched after receiving the victim’s report, did not comply with the request to leave the victim without justifiable reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of the law to report the occurrence of the case

1. Relevant Article 319 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning a crime and Article 319 (2) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the facts charged of this case, the defense counsel and the defendant's defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the defendant's defense counsel on the provisional payment order cannot be viewed as a legitimate request for eviction, since the defendant's unilateral request for eviction cannot be viewed as a legitimate request for eviction, even if the defendant did not comply with such request, it does not constitute a crime of refusing eviction or constitutes a justifiable

However, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant was doubtful of the non-humane relationship between the victim and the husband, and the victim was asked to leave the beauty room, but did not comply with the request.