1. On December 30, 2016, the Defendant’s “victim” against the Plaintiff and the reported and accused students.

The details and details of the disposition taken by 11 students, including the Plaintiff, etc. (hereinafter “11 students”), were enrolled in E in 2016 (hereinafter “victim students”) and the 1st and 8th class in Seoul D secondary school.

D. On December 30, 2016, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “the instant autonomous committee”) held a meeting on December 30, 2016, “from 11 semester to 2016, 11 persons, including the Plaintiff, play the speech violence against the victim student or exercised the speech violence against the victim student even if the request for prohibition of the victim student was made) and physical violence (the Plaintiff exercised 3-4 physical violence against the victim student almost every day and at least 3-4 times per day. The Plaintiff, along with other aggressors, sent the victim student his/her head, went beyond the victim student with his/her he/she was present, and then went beyond the victim student’s victim’s victim’s humd, and tried to injure the victim student’s children’s humd, and, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s act of notifying and notifying the Plaintiff of his/her act of prohibiting school violence and intimidation against the victim student under Article 8(1) of the Act on the Prevention of and Accusation against School Violence (hereinafter “the instant Act”).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition,” which is subject to the prohibition of contact, intimidation, and return of the victimized student and the reported or accused student, and the “measures taken to transfer” (hereinafter “instant disposition”). [The grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 and 4, and the purport of the entire pleadings, are legitimate.