1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiffs and victims H (hereinafter “victim students”) were the same half-year students attending the fourth and fourth grade of G Elementary School (hereinafter “instant class”).

On May 8, 2016, the victim victim entered the plaintiffs' interference with the abuse of victim students in Japan, and entered the same purport in September 21, 2016.

After reporting it to the teacher in charge of school violence and investigating it in the department in charge of school violence, the mother of the victim was reported to the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence after the interview with the relevant students, and the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence was held on October 5, 2016.

On October 10, 2016, according to the result of the meeting of the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiffs measures to prohibit contact, intimidation, and retaliation against victim students and reported or accused students under Article 17(1)2 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”), and transfer disposition under Article 17(1)8 of the same Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

From April 2016, the plaintiffs continuously see the blind spot (the toilet, corridor, stairs, meal room, physical training hours, music hours, English time, computer hours, or moving time) of the teacher at the time of the teacher at the meeting of the teacher at the meeting of the teacher at the meeting, such as “I”, “J”, etc. The distance of “fluence”, which is the brut of the student at the time of the teacher at the meeting, scam, play with sound, and play. In addition, when considering the brut of the student at the toilet, the victim scam or scam together with heavy humiliation, and the victim scam in the toilet, the victim scam in his clothes, and the “frut” play. The plaintiff D shows that at the time of the computer, the victim scam and scambling of the student at the time of the action of the victim at the time of the victim at the level of “L”, and the victim scam and behavior of the victim.