beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Larceny;
A. At around 20:20 on July 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a door that was parked in C’s door, at the time of Jeju, did not correct the D’s car; (b) and (c) took one credit card form of the Jeju Bank owned by the Victim E, which was located in the front goods storage box.
B. On September 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a door that was parked on the street in front of the Fth of the Jeju Island; and (b) cut off the door with KRW 15,000 in cash owned by the victim H; (c) KRW 15,00 in cash owned by the victim H; (d) KRW 10,000 in KRW 10,000 in KRW 10,000 in KRW 10,000 in KRW; and (e) one in Korea bank card; and (e) one in which the market price cannot be known.
2. Attempted larceny;
A. On September 12, 2015, around 07:30 on September 12, 2015, the Defendant opened a door that was parked at the J parking lot in Jeju, in order to steal the property, and opened the door inside the bank owned by the victim L who was in the front line and colored the property to be stolen, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime but did not commit a wind that was discovered by the victim who was located at the top of the top, and arrested him as a flagrant offender.
B. On September 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:20 on September 13, 2015, the Jeju Viewing Civil Service Center’s parking lot located in the Jeju Viewing Civil Service Center, in order to steal the property, carried the knife of the driver’s seat of the MA car parked therein into the vehicle; (b) however, the Defendant did not carry the intent on the wind where the door is corrected, but did not commit an attempted crime.
3. On July 5, 2015, the Defendant violated the Fraud and the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act stated the victim’s O indictment in Q as “ Q” in the victim’s O indictment located under N in Jeju on July 5, 2015. However, Q is merely the other party to the deception as an employee of the said dan, and the victim of the crime of fraud should be deemed as the O (Evidence No. 2 & No. 17 pages) of the said dan’s business owner, and there is no disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense. Therefore, the correction should be made ex officio, as stated in