(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.02.20 2019나34170

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.02.20 2019나34170

체불임금등

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the defendant taken over the status of the deceased by force, i.e., “indecent act by force and by force,” No. 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2; and (b) the second 13 of the second 13, “the defendant has the obligation to pay the above money to the plaintiff. In this case, the defendant has the obligation to pay the money to the plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased.” (b) The defendant has the obligation to pay the above money to the plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased.” (c) The third 18 to 410 of the third 10 of the 3rd 10th mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar

2. Additional determination

A. (1) The summary of the claim on the payment of ordinary wage level (1) argues that, even if the agreement on the payment of wages between the deceased is not acknowledged, the amount of ordinary wage level should be paid even if the agreement on the payment of wages is not accepted, the Plaintiff asserts that the amount of ordinary wage level should be paid. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff should be paid even if the agreement on the payment of wages of KRW 3,00,000 per month between the deceased and the deceased is not recognized.

(2) According to the records in Gap evidence No. 2, although it is recognized that the deceased would give money to the plaintiff if his lawsuit is well-grounded, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the deceased agreed to pay the price for the plaintiff's work regardless of the outcome of the lawsuit, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion that seeks to pay the amount of ordinary wages is without merit.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion of consolation money due to unfair dismissal is determined between the deceased and the Plaintiff.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2020.02.20 2019나34170

-창원지방법원 2015.10.15 2015나30736

-서울고등법원 2017.05.30 2016누79733

-서울행정법원 2018.07.27 2017구합4932

-부산지방법원 2019.03.21 2018나49871