1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this part of the judgment concerning the main claim is that the "Masan-gun Military Police Officer" of the second 10th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "Masan-gun Military Police Officer", and the second 18th 18 to 3th 4th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th

According to the above facts, according to the defendant's recognition, Msan Military Police Team, etc. of Msan-gun, etc. of the defendant, is a network B (hereinafter "the deceased") of which punishment has become final and conclusive.

As long as the right to life, which is the fundamental right of the people guaranteed by the Constitution, is infringed by making a judgment of a death sentence against the prohibition against double Jeopardy and murdering, this constitutes a public official’s unlawful act, and as such, it is apparent in light of the empirical rule that the deceased and his bereaved family members suffered heavy mental pain. Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obliged to compensate the deceased who have made a sacrifice due to his/her unlawful performance of duties pursuant to Article 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea (amended by Act No. 17, Jul. 17, 1948 and amended by Act No. 15, Jun.

However, the plaintiff asserts that the deceased was solely inherited the above damages owed to the defendant and sought payment of the above amount against the defendant.

However, according to the results of the fact-finding of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, No. 3-1, and each fact-finding with respect to the original prison of the court of first instance, the deceased was removed from the Msan-gun Military Police around August 24, 1950 after he was admitted to the Msan-gun Office on August 24, 1949, according to the fact-finding report by the Minsan-gun Military Police Officers for Truth Reconciliation, according to the 2009 Report by the Minsan-gun Reorganization Commission for Truth Reconciliation, the deceased was transferred to the Military Court and investigated that the death was executed after he was transferred to the Military Court. Meanwhile, the plaintiff reported the marriage with the deceased on September 25, 1961, and the plaintiff can be recognized as having reported the marriage with the deceased on September 25, 1961.