Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on November 25, 1986;

A. On September 1, 2008, Defendant B and Defendant B were sexual intercourse at the motherel where it is impossible to know the trade name at the time of early P.M. on September 208;

B. At G hotel located in F of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, 2008, each of whom is linked to Defendant B once with each other;

2. Defendant B knew that he is a spouse of Defendant A, and even at the same time, at the same time and place as that of the above 1. A and two times sexual intercourses with Defendant A, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. Application of statutes to a copy of resident registration record card, copy of family relation certificate, and marriage relation certificate;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (the heavier penalty than the penalty prescribed for concurrent crimes against Haman on September 2008);

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of each Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the first offender A; Defendant B had no criminal record for the same kind of offense; and the fact