Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed the marriage report with C on August 25, 1982;

(a) communicate with B one-time sexual intercourse in a room in which it is not possible to find out the heading of the EMel D around October 3, 2012;

B. Around October 6, 2012, a single sexual intercourse with B at the same place as above; and

C. Around October 10, 2012, the call room of the telecom with B and once in a room in which it is impossible to find out the room of the telecome in the family-si transfer-based;

D. Around October 15, 2012, the care room of the Gel in Macheon-si F was livered with B one-time sexual intercourse in a room where it is impossible to find out the care room of the Gel.

2. Defendant B knew that he is a spouse of A, Defendant B had sexual intercourse with A four times, as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the warden receipt certificate center;

1. Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the defendant is against his/her will);