logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.19 2015구합23176
부작위위법확인
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 200, the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy determined a long-term power supply and demand plan including the establishment of a transportation system for power generation of the reported Riwons and the implementation of the instant projects for the construction of the electric transmission lines in the Yong-Nam area. On October 2003, the Defendant planned the scheduled progress of the planned progress of the transmission line (hereinafter referred to as “the scheduled progress of the beginning progress”) leading to the north-west-west through the Busan-gun, the head of the Busan-gun, the head of the Gu, the Busan-gun, the head of the Si/Gun, and the head of the Si/Gun, the head of the Si/Gun, the head of the Si/Gun, the head of the Si/Gun, and the head of the Si/Gun, the head of the Si/Gun, the head of the

A) Around December 2005, the Defendant tried to hold an explanatory meeting on the initial progress of the project and around January 2006, but discussed a consultative body for the change of the progress of the transmission line comprised of five representatives of the Defendant, five representatives of the captain-gun, and 11 representatives of the residents of the city, in the process of the project, from the date of the project to the date of the project, the project size was 16,648 square meters in size, 18.69km in length, and 35 square meters in length in a steel tower. (2) The Defendant intended to hold an explanatory meeting on the initial progress of the project on December 2006 after preparing the draft environmental impact assessment report on the land in question. However, in the process of the project, the agreement was formed to change the progress of the transmission line of the electric transmission line of this case, which was proposed by the Defendant, to the date of the project on which the head of the Dong-gun Industrial Complex, the head of the Dong-gun, the head of the Eup, and the village in Busan-do.

3) On March 2007, the Defendant: (a) the Minister of Knowledge Economy, a business approval authority; (b) the Minister of Knowledge Economy (the Minister of Knowledge Economy, a business approval authority; (c) around 20,576 km in length; (d) the transmission line of 20,576 km in length and the steel tower supporting such transmission line (hereinafter “the case”).

arrow