The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant was engaged in bathing service activities at “D Comprehensive Welfare Center for Persons with Disabilities” in Jeju at the time of the instant charges.

person is a person.

1. On April 10, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E: (a) around 20:00, at the house of the victim (referred to as the victim’s 49 tax, delay, brain cerebral disease Nos. 4, and euthanasia) located in F at Jeju-si, to measure the victim’s vision by putting the victim on the floor and laying the victim on the floor, and then putting the victim’s fingers in hand.

As a result, the defendant committed indecent acts against a person with a physical or mental disability through deceptive means.

2. The Defendant committed the crime against the Victim G, from July 2014 to August 2018, 2014, took the victim (class 67 years of age and visual impairment 1 level) in the Defendant’s house located in He at Jeju, and took the victim’s house and obscenity, putting the victim on the floor, laid off the victim’s clothes on the floor, and laid off the victim’s clothes, and immediately took charge of the victim’s sexual organ, and was the chest of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant forced the victim with a physical disability to commit an indecent act.

3. On March 17, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim I, at the house of the victim (class 59 years old, delay, hearing impairment 3 level) who was located in the J Apartment apartment unit in Jeju-si around 20:0, and performed the alcohol with the victim while drinking the alcohol together with the victim, leading the victim to the victim as soon as he gets the chest, and met the victim’s sexual organ by hand.

As a result, the defendant forced the victim with a physical disability to commit an indecent act.

2. Determination

A. The recognition of facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial should be based on strict evidence of probative value, which leads to a judge to have the conviction that the facts charged are true, beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to sufficiently reach the degree of such conviction, even if the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable, and there is suspicion of guilt, such as the defendant’s non-competence.