1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The plaintiff's assertion cited in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is not different from the assertion made in the court of first instance. Thus, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the evidence added in this court are combined.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for adding the arguments emphasized by this court and the judgment thereof as seen in paragraph (2), and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Therefore, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

An abbreviation shall be based on the abbreviation of the judgment of the court of first instance.

▣ 제1심판결문 3쪽 위에서 11줄의 ‘940,000000’을 ‘940,000,000’으로 고친다.

▣ 제1심판결문 4쪽 위에서 5줄의 ‘(이하 ‘이 사건 판결’이라 한다)‘ 다음에 ’이에 대하여 H와 E은 광주고등법원 2017나12461호로 항소하였으나, 광주고등법원은 2018. 9. 14. 원고의 부대항소를 받아들여 H와 E에게 이 사건 판결에서 지급을 명한 금액에 더하여 72,431,507원 및 이에 대한 지연손해금의 지급을 추가로 명하는 판결을 선고하였고, 이 판결은 2018. 10. 2. 확정되었다.‘를 추가한다.

▣ 제1심판결문 5쪽 위에서 7줄의 ‘각 기재’ 다음에 ‘이 법원에 현저한 사실’을 추가한다.

▣ 제1심판결문 5쪽 아래에서 7줄, 10줄의 각 ‘H에’를 모두 ‘E에게’로 고친다.

▣ 제1심판결문 9쪽 위에서 11줄의 ‘갑 제37호증’을 ‘을 제37호증’으로 고친다.

2. As to the plaintiff's assertion in this court

A. 1 Plaintiff’s assertion that each claim for reimbursement of this case was not a modified element of H’s duty to cancel the right to collateral security, is difficult to view that the amount necessary for cancellation of each of the instant claims is the same as the amount subrogated by the Defendants. Rather, each of the instant claims may be cancelled in the amount less than the amount subrogated by the Defendants.