beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for four months, and Defendant C for a fine of three million won, respectively.
Defendant
C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A was composed of an organization that operates a so-called passbook receipt and cash withdrawal of an international telecommunications fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scam”) organization. The organization is composed of an organization that operates a call center at a scam point below China, operates a passbook, and operates a passbook in Korea to induce transfer and deposit by telephone, and an organization that takes the role of withdrawing and remitting the amount of damage from the passbook. Under the instruction of a person who is a general book in China, the employee in distress made a call at a call center in China to unspecified domestic people and deliver the amount to the Defendant, who is a domestic cash withdrawal book using Kwikset-line services, etc. using the access media such as the check card, etc., which is the general book in China. Moreover, the employee in distress in other names, under the instruction of the person who is the above general book, transferred a certain amount of money from the call center in China to the victims, and the Defendant, from Korea, transferred the money to the Chinese government by taking over the above access media such as the name of the person who was not assigned to the above organization.
(a) No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or take over any access medium in using or managing the access medium, or lend or borrow any access medium while demanding or promising to give or receive compensation;
Nevertheless, on November 9, 2015, the Defendant received a letter of check (credit number G) from F for one bank account in the name-free Kwikset service provider in the new Kwikset service station in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and received a total of 15 approaches, including the following from around that time to November 17, 2015: (a) from around that time, the Defendant was issued a letter of access to the account in the name of one bank; and (b) from around that time, the Defendant was issued a medium of 15 copies, such as the one in the list of crimes in attached Table 1.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above-mentioned person, acquired the above-mentioned access media.