logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.05.25 2018고단517
전기통신금융사기피해방지및피해금환급에관한특별법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person responsible for soliciting the head of an international telecommunications finance fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scaming”), which is called “C”, and the Defendant is a person who was responsible for soliciting the head of a Tong, and D, E, F, G, etc. as a person responsible for soliciting the head of a Tong.

The above organization is composed of an organization that operates a call center in China or below, and that leads to the transfer and deposit of passbooks by telephone in Korea, and that takes charge of the management and operation of the call center in China at the call center in accordance with the direction of C, which is the general responsibility in China. D, E, F, G, etc. directly calls to unspecified domestic people for the lease of the passbook and deliver the access media, such as the check card, to H, a book of solicitation in Korea using Kwikkset Service, etc., and the infinite employee in the name name was allowed to call at the call center in China to unspecified domestic people and transfer the money to the account of the passbook secured by the above money, and the cash withdrawal policy in name was made in order to withdraw the money deposited as above from Korea to the above order of C.

1. On September 2, 2014, D, upon the direction of the criminal defendant, calls from the victim I to the victim I to use the passbook for the purpose of cutting off, around September 2, 2014.

One head of the Tong shall be lent to 2 million won per month, and 2 million won per week shall be lent to 5 million won per month.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, D did not have any idea to use the e-mail card for the above purpose, and it was thought that the e-mail card was used for the e-mailing crime, so there was no intention or ability to pay the rent even if the e-mail was issued by the injured party.

The Defendant, in collusion with C, D, E, F, G, H, etc., induces the victim as above.

arrow