logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.20 2017나51501
매매대금
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay the warranty bond from the plaintiff 15,435.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into a household supply contract with the Defendant as follows, and supplied the Defendant with the goods such as furniture (hereinafter “instant goods”).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant supply contract”. (1) 1. - General household/Ban household supply contract date: January 13, 2015 - Contract amount of general household/Ban-raw materials, - Contract amount of 84,279,960 (Additional dues): - On-site construction site of 121-81, 120, 300, 200, 300, 200, 300, 200, 200, 30,000,000: - General household/Ban-1,000,000,000,000: 3:0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

B. The Defendant paid to the Plaintiff totaling KRW 287,113,678 from February 16, 2015 to September 24, 2015 under the above supply contract: (a) the total amount of the above contract amount including the value added tax is KRW 308,709,709,159 [=280,64,690 + KRW 102,364,730 KRW 102,364,730 KRW 94,70,00), 1.5,481 (= KRW 308,709,159 KRW - KRW 287,113,678)]; and (b) the payable amount is KRW 21,59,481 (=308,709,159 KRW - KRW 287,678).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1 to 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion regarding the cause of the claim.

arrow