Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;
2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
3...
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 29, 2002, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Seoul District Court, and on February 23, 199, the Defendant was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months of suspension of execution for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Seoul Western District Court on February 23, 199, and was sentenced to 15 times of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Seoul Western District Court on November 7, 1990.
1. The Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;
A. On October 2012, around 21:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim, who was returned to his house, on the ground that the victim C(56 years of age) would drink alcohol first, following the Gambuck center located in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gambucking around 21:00.
B. At around 22:10 on March 22, 2013, the Defendant, at the victim C’s house located on the second floor in the E market located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City E market, was dissatisfied with the victim’s scambling of the scambling of the scambling of the scambling of the scambling of the scambling of the scam.
C. On March 24, 2013, around 22:25, the Defendant assaulted the back head of the victim at one time on the ground that the Defendant reported the victim to the police on the following three (3) residential intrusion in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, and on the ground that the victim reported the victim to the police.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually assaulted the defendant.
2. On March 24, 2013, at around 22:00, the Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) collected alcohol residues on a G cafeteria located in the E market located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu; (b) collected alcohol residues on the table; and (c) Had the victim H (n, 59 years of age) who is the principal restaurant at the above cafeteria; (d) Had the victim’s Had, who is the principal restaurant at the south cafeteria; and (e) Had the victim at another place.