(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.12.14 2018나210189

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.12.14 2018나210189

양수금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is amended; and (b) thus, it is acceptable

2. Parts 1-d;

subsection (b) shall be deleted.

[Reasons for Recognition] of paragraph (1) shall be added to the column “A evidence No. 6, and No. 3”.

ARTICLE 2-A

The plaintiff in the first behavior of the first behavior "the plaintiff" is "the plaintiff," "the defendant in the second behavior is "the plaintiff," and "the plaintiff" in the third behavior is "the defendant," respectively.

The part of paragraph (3) shall be dried as follows:

“A. The Plaintiff filed a claim against Defendant B, along with Defendant C, shall be the head and by-products (hereinafter “by-products, etc.”) of the instant slaughterhouse from Defendant C.

(2) The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B is without merit. However, according to the evidence evidence No. 5, the Plaintiff’s acceptance of by-products, etc. from the slaughterhouse of this case is not the Defendant B but the fact that Defendant C was not the Defendant, and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that Defendant B received the head and by-products of the lawsuit, or that the Plaintiff was liable to pay the price for the non-party company. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim against the non-party B is without merit. (B) The Plaintiff consented to the Plaintiff’s occurrence of by-products, etc. from May 2013 to March 2016 from the Plaintiff’s request for slaughter by the non-party company, or it is recognized by the statement No. 5, and according to the evidence No. 1 to 5, No. 6, and No. 10-1 to 4-4, the Plaintiff’s acceptance of by-products, etc. from the by-products of the Plaintiff during the above period.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2018.08.16 2017가단115835

-광주지방법원 2014.05.01 2013가단52511

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.07.06 2016고단440

-광주지방법원 2015.01.07 2014나5612

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2020.02.13 2017고정595