A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2009, the Defendant, in a mutual influorial restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, has a lot of benefits to the victim B when he/she provided by-products through a person who has a child on the side of the nextsan Livestock Cooperative.

B. If N. N. N. invests KRW 100 million each month, it remains at least KRW 20 million in one month, which is a defect. 100 million in width's investment is entered the Livestock Cooperative as a right deposit for by-products, so it is not possible to understand it.

“.....”

Since September 2009, the Defendant called the victim at Ysan-si on September 1, 2009, and sent KRW 2 million to the victim “(200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won can be punished if the Defendant scam the sub-products business.

different types.

“.....”

On October 22, 2009, the Defendant continued to call the victim at Yasan-si, and only 1 million won of the "Tang-si sales of Tang-si."

It shall send the remainder of 81 million won as to the investment of 19 million won in the small by-products business.

different types.

“.....”

However, in fact, the by-products of cattle, which were requested to be slaughtered in the Annsan-gun Livestock Cooperative, were directly treated at the slaughterhouse, and the defendant was not in a situation to obtain a license for the by-products from the Livestock Cooperative, and the defendant had the intent to pay the defendant's debt or to use the money received from the injured party for personal business, so even if receiving the investment from the injured party, the victim did not have the intent or ability to pay

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 18 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of C on October 14, 2009, and continued to receive KRW 31 million on October 22, 2009, and received KRW 99 million in total from the said account as a business investment loan for by-products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. B.