Text
1. The Defendant’s annual payment of KRW 79,232,100 and KRW 23,066,684, out of its money, to the date of full payment from February 10, 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 23, 2003, the non-party Samsung Card Co., Ltd. loaned a loan of KRW 23,070,000 (hereinafter “instant loan claim”) to the Defendant on December 23, 200 by setting the lending period and repayment terms to 12 months, repayment period 72 months, interest rate of 11% per annum, and overdue interest rate of KRW 23,070,00 (hereinafter “instant loan claim”).
B. Thereafter, on November 11, 2010, Samsung Card Co., Ltd. transferred all of the instant loan claims to Solomon Savings Bank, Solomon Savings Bank, and notified the Defendant thereof. On December 30, 201, Solomon Savings Bank Co., Ltd. transferred all of the instant loan claims to Solomon Savings Bank, and notified the Defendant thereof. On May 29, 2013, 201, the Nlomon Savings Bank transferred all of the instant loan claims to the Plaintiff and notified the Defendant.
C. Meanwhile, the outstanding principal and interest of the instant loan claims as of December 15, 2014 are KRW 23,066,684, interest 56,165,416, total of KRW 79,232,100,00.
【Ground for Recognition: Facts that there is no dispute between the parties or is not clearly disputed, Gap evidence 1-1 to Gap evidence, and the purport of whole pleadings】
2. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from February 10, 2015 to the full payment date, as the Plaintiff seeks with respect to KRW 79,232,10, and KRW 23,066,684, which is the principal of the loan, out of the total sum of the principal and interest of the loan to the Plaintiff, a transferee of the loan claim of this case, and KRW 23,06,684, which is the principal of the loan.
3. As to the defendant's defense, the defendant defenses that the extinctive prescription of the principal and interest of this case has expired, but there is no evidence to prove that the extinctive prescription of the principal and interest of this case has expired, and rather, according to the above basic facts.