A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 14, 2015, at around 18:55, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the house located in the Gumi-si B, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was forced to stop from the police box D belonging to the police box belonging to the police box belonging to the Gumi-si police station, which called “I am flag, I see what I am. I am. I see the above police officer’s left knick at his hand. I see two times the left knick of the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes governing the place of work;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the following extenuating circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. One month to five years from the date of imprisonment with prison labor for a prison labor in law; and

2. Type 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Compelling of Duties) (Scope of Recommendations) (Scope of Punishment), from 6 months to 1 year and 4 months (basic area).

3. The Defendant, who has been sentenced to imprisonment with labor or a fine on several occasions for violent crimes, was sentenced to a fine due to damage to goods for public use, interference with the execution of official duties, etc.

In addition, it is an element of sentencing unfavorable to the defendant that has reached the same criminal act of this case.

However, the degree of violence committed by the defendant was not serious to significantly obstruct the execution of official duties, and the defendant was satisfyed to the extent that he could not memory the situation at the time, and recognized and against his mistake at the present.

In addition, the sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the disposition, and the reasons for taking into account the circumstances.