logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.09.12 2013고정215
도로교통법위반등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be 2,00,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:05 on January 23, 2013, the Defendant driven a 100CC U.S. U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. P. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry in the register of driver's licenses (35 pages);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Point of drinking under the judgment: Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

(b) Point of driving without obtaining a license: Article 154 subparagraph 2 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Article 40 or 50 of the Criminal Act (the punishment imposed on a person who violates the Road Traffic Act with heavier punishment and the selection of a fine) for the ordinary concurrence and the selection of a punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On January 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 23:05, at the 23:05, the summary of the facts charged: (b) the Defendant: (c) went bypass from the direction of the box to the postal concentration station, the head of the Sincheon-gun, Young-gun, Samcheon-gun, Samcheon-gun, a Sindong-gun, to the intersection of the shooting distance. (d) At this point, the Defendant: (a) had a duty of care to take the front door and left well for those who are engaged in the vehicle driving on the alleys; and (b) had a duty of care to safely operate the vehicle by using the steering gear and brakes properly; (b) due to negligence in the course of performing his duties, the Defendant destroyed the said vehicle by taking part of the victim’s Crop-ray driver’s driver’s front part of the Defendant’s car running in a gold apartment located in the line of the mail concentration; and (c) thereby, (d) thereby, (e) damaged the said vehicle.

2. We examine the judgment, and this part of the facts charged is the crime falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

arrow