beta
Text
1. Defendant B, C, D, and E jointly share to the Selection G 5,089,640 won, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Selection H 1,000.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The designated parties G (hereinafter “G”) and Defendant B (I) are those who graduated from the same middle school, and Defendant D (J) was the relatives of Defendant B.
The Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Appointed Party H (hereinafter “Appointed Party”); G, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); and the Appointed Party (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) are G’s parents; Defendant C is the mother of Defendant B, Defendant F, and Defendant D’s parents.
B. On April 11, 2012, Defendant B, and D conspiredd G with their head about about one to two occasions, on the second floor of the building in which L driving institutes located in Yongsan-gu, U.S., U.K. located in Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Goyang-si, G assaulted G due to the buckbucks, foods, face, tights, tights, tights, knicks, knicks, knicks, knicks, knicks, knicks, knicks, knicks, knicks, and knicks the head of G, thereby causing injury to G, such as spucks, clothes, shoulders, knicks, and knicks.
Defendant B and D received each juvenile protective disposition due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) as to the above act.
C. G’s medical examination and treatment process (1) G was conducted on April 11, 2012, on the date of the instant accident, in an emergency room at Mangsan Hospital at Mangsan University, and received medical treatment on April 14, 2012 at the Seoul Uniform Hospital.
(2) Since then G was hospitalized for pain management from April 16, 2012 to April 30, 2012.
(3) G was hospitalized from May 17, 2012 to May 21, 2012 because he/she took excessively his/her mental and drugs.
(4) Even after the discharge from the foregoing hospital, G was received from May 8, 2012 to May 25, 2012 as a mental hospital.
(5) After the instant accident, G was diagnosed in an gambling room requiring medical treatment for 22 days or 15 days, and was diagnosed on June 5, 2012.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, 10 to 12, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Parties’ assertion.