logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.05.07 2019고단5176
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B K7 in light of the Special Act on the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On December 1, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol more than 0.03% of blood alcohol level, driven the said K7 car with the above K7 car, and continued the two-lane road in front of the Naju Fire Fighting Station, which is located in 4201 in the direction of the Jeonnam-si, the front side of the Naju Fire Fighting Station, along the one-lane of the viewing room in the front side of the Naju-si.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the new subparagraph, thoroughly and thoroughly.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected this and did not thoroughly conduct the front week while driving the vehicle in front of the said K7 car, and did not receive a part of the victim C(60 years old)’s driving, which stopped for the signal atmosphere at the front of the said K7 car, following the victim C(60 years old)’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence as above.

2. On June 28, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

At around 17:35 on December 1, 2019, the Defendant driven the said K7 car from the front side of F in Haju-si E in Haju-si to the front side of the said Naju Fire Station, while under the influence of alcohol more than 0.03% of alcohol content.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on investigation (a review as to drinking water);

1. Reports on internal investigation (investigation into victims C Telephones);

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Previouss before judgment: Criminal history records;

arrow