logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.06.15 2017노987
위증
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The court below held that perjury is a crime that obstructs the discovery of substantial truth and appropriate exercise of judicial power, and therefore requires strict punishment. At the court of first instance of this case, it seems that D has affected the defendant's perjury. At the court of first instance of this case, D won won won the defendant's perjury and it seems that D had no record of punishment exceeding the same criminal record and fine, D's participation in D's request, and there are some circumstances to consider the circumstances of the crime of this case. The Busan District Court 2014 ruled D's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's ''' 's 's 's 's 's ''' 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's ' 's ' 's ' 's ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 's ' ' ' 's ' ' 's ' 's 's 's 's 's 's '.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow