logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.18 2017노4083
위증
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant recognized the crime, and the defendant's perjury did not affect the trial result. However, perjury requires strict punishment as an act impeding the discovery of substantial truth by a judicial agency and the appropriate exercise of judicial power through the discovery of perjury, the defendant does not neglect to deny the sale and receipt of his/her own penphones, and proves perjury at the trial of C, which was prosecuted for perjury during the period of suspension of execution, and is an offense during the period of suspension of execution. In light of the above, the sentence of the court below is appropriate and too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow