logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.01.24 2017고단3198
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and two years of suspended execution on the grounds of compulsory execution, and attempted fraud in Seoul Western District Court, and the sentence became final and conclusive on December 31, 2015.

On April 20, 2015, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of a criminal trial at the Seoul Western District Court of Mapo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 174 (Public Ethics Dong) to commit fraud against D, 2014 Highest 2380, 2014, and gave a testimony. As to the question, “The witness of the defense counsel at all doubtful whether or not this claim is false.”

And such claims have the principal.

Don, or another transfer received and later received, in advance than that received later.

Does this talk, ever, ever.

By doing so, I were present at the same location as in paragraph (1).

As to the question, “I answer what is, there is a payment order, fair deed, and the witness also knows E, F, and G, but this is nothing more than a false bond.”

“The counsel does not have a pipe in the middle of the witness,” and the counsel does not have a pipe.

In response to the question of "the case", "the case of " and the case of false bonds" and "the case of "the question of "the case of the witness" and "the case of "the case of the question of "the case of the witness," and then the next case of the successful bidder shall be the case of "the case of the witness."

There was no need for two persons to do this talk, and the author did not exchange all such contents with G and F agents.

“The answer was made.”

However, the facts are as follows: (a) in collusion with the above H, F, G, and E with respect to the apartment house of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, which is owned by H outside of public prosecution, the defendant claimed a successful bid, but the above claim is a false bond. (b) In order to make a false bond (F 5.3 billion won, E.5 billion won, G.30 million won, G.), the defendant claimed a successful bid.

arrow