logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2020.08.26 2019가단12773
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 27,528,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from April 23, 2019 to August 26, 2020.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 16, 2019, the Plaintiff agreed to supply Nonparty C Co., Ltd. with KRW 40,000,000 for KRW 35,000,000 for pine trees (hereinafter “instant pine trees”).

B. On April 22, 2019, the Plaintiff employed three landscaped gardens, such as E, to excavate and transfer the instant pine trees from D’s farm, and leased 45 tons of heavy seasons (F; hereinafter “the instant heavy season”) from the Defendant.

C. The Plaintiff extracted the instant pine trees by using scrails, etc., instructed and supervised landscaping workers to dump the instant pine trees, and instructed E to win the instant pine trees on the truck using the instant climate, and left the site.

Afterwards, E and non-party G installed one sprinkler level (one log, one log, one log, and two sprinkler mark) in the middle part of the reducing body of the instant pine trees, and two sludges in the lower part of the reducing body of the instant pine trees (the intermediate part is small assistant, and the following part is installed in a large camera) and connected them to the mider of the instant whistle (one sprinkler mark was installed in the lower part of the instant pine trees, but the lower part was placed in the lower part of the instant pine trees, but the lower part was impossible to catch the pine trees properly, and the witness testifieded to add it. The Defendant testifieded to the lower part of the instant pine in the direction of which the risks of the truck engineer was notified, and the Defendant operated the instant pine in the direction of the Plaintiff’s operation, and then the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s operation of the instant pine.

arrow