Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 04:50 on June 29, 2018, the Defendant driven a B rocketing taxi (hereinafter referred to as “drawing vehicle”) and proceeded to the left at the Do counterside from the surface of the Do counterside in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to turn to the left. While there was a duty of care to safely drive, such as complying with the signal, the Defendant neglected the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle, and neglected to turn to the left, thereby neglecting the duty of care to turn to the left at the opposite lane, and violated the signal, and caused the victim E (66 years old)’s failure to turn to the left, thereby taking the front part of the part of the damaged vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “drawing vehicle”) into account the victim G (52 years old), who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, to suffer from the victim’s 2-day treatment of the damaged vehicle, such as 1 kye, e.g., the victim’s injury necessary for treatment of the victim’s 2-day off.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of the E statement;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. A copy of each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black boxes and video CDs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of the Order to Attend the Course is that the defendant recognized his mistake, and the victim G, E, and I agreed with it, and the damage inflicted upon the victim H appears to have been restored to the mutual aid coverage, and the damage suffered by the victim H appears to have not any history of criminal punishment against the defendant, while the accident of this case occurred.