logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2019.10.29 2018가합31005
장로지위존재확인의 소
Text

1. All plaintiffs' lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1) G religious organizations (hereinafter “G religious organizations”)

A) The term “H” is an organization consisting of reputation, reputation, executives, traders, etc. that believe H. The Defendant is an organization consisting of reputation, reputation, reputation, and trading parties, etc. belonging to I Regional Religious Organizations in order to have jurisdiction over the business and administration of G Religious Organizations, and its representative is called as a supervisor. 2) The F Religious Organization is affiliated with the G Religious Organization Council and is subject to the supervision of the said Council and the Defendant’s affiliated therewith.

3) While the Plaintiffs initially been dispatched from the Defendant to the head of the FJ to which the Defendant belongs, they were disqualified as the head on February 23, 2014 and February 26, 2015. On February 18, 2016, the Plaintiffs were subject to a disposition of long-term dispatch reservation on the ground that they were not dispatched at the local council in 2016, and they were disqualified as the head on the ground that they were not dispatched for three years for three years. B. around 2013 and around 2013, the number and the conflict between the Plaintiffs and the K FJ pastors came to be a member of the FJ, and there was a conflict between the Plaintiffs and the KF pastors, and accordingly, between the members within the FJs upon their request, the Plaintiffs were unable to submit the request for long-term reservation and withdrawal of the dispatch to the head of the FJs to the head of the Si/Gun/Gu in accordance with the Defendant’s request to the head of the Si/Gun/Gu.

2. On February 5, 2014, 2014, the Plaintiffs: “The Defendant’s supervisor” was the head of the Fademy, the Defendant’s Fademy, and was in accordance with Article 20(3) of the Tdemy and Temy.

1.26. Requests the withdrawal of a request for reservation submitted;

‘A' has submitted a request for withdrawal of reservation with content. D.

The defendant, on February 6, 2014 and February 23, 2014, issued a resolution of the reservation on dispatched on February 6, 2014, shall be the plaintiffs on February 6, 2014.

arrow