1. On October 23, 2016, among the instant lawsuits, a request for confirmation of invalidity of a resolution to dismiss a personnel committee in the jurisdiction of the Republic of Korea.

1. Details of the instant case

A. Defendant E-Appellee (hereinafter “Defendant church”) is an individual church belonging to Defendant B religious organizations (hereinafter “Defendant B”).

Defendant D local council (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant D local council”) is an organization comprised of traders, directors, former directors, representatives of power companies, etc. who conduct activities among the members of the F region among those belonging to Defendant B in order to have jurisdiction over Defendant B’s business and administration in F region. Defendant Cirs association (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Cirs association”) is an organization comprised of regular members to have jurisdiction over Defendant B’s business and administration in F and G regions, which is a metropolitan unit, the number of local councils elected by each local council of the same number.

The plaintiff is a current or former member of the defendant church.

B. On April 21, 2016, the head of the Defendant church that filed an accusation against the Plaintiff, and H and the competent association I filed an accusation against the Plaintiff with the purport that the Plaintiff committed an offense, such as the Plaintiff’s members J (one day K; hereinafter “J”) and engaging in sexual intercourse with L, etc. Around April 21, 2016, the Defendant Cir Council Review Committee prosecuted the Plaintiff on May 24, 2016 in accordance with the above accusation.

C. On July 4, 2016, each of the decisions of the Defendant Cirs Trial Committee and the Defendant B’s Cirs Trial Committee rendered a judgment that the Plaintiff was guilty of both the charges charged on July 4, 2016 and the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant B’s General Assembly Trial Committee.

On September 29, 2016, the Defendant B’s General Assembly Trial Committee rendered a judgment that the Plaintiff is punished by withdrawing the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 5(2) of Part VII Trial Act on the ground that the Plaintiff committed sexual intercourse with the J and the doctrine of Defendant B and Article 3(13) and Article 4(1) of Part VII Trial Act on the ground that the Plaintiff committed sexual intercourse with the J and the principal of the case.

(hereinafter “this case’s departure judgment”) D.

Removal of the Plaintiff.