logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단2391
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:40 on June 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 at the close of the Defendant’s house located in Yangyang-si, Namyang-si, that “the Defendant fright to son,” and reported 112, the police officers affiliated with the branch of the branch of the branch of the Namyang-gu Police Station, who called, listened to the circumstances of the case from the Defendant’s children; and (b) sealed the Defendant’s chest by hand; and (c) thereby, the Defendant fright the Defendant’s shoulder to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of the performance of official duties; (d) removed the class of the Defendant’s shoulder, she laid off, she laid off, she was tight with his shoulder and her kick.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties on 112 reporting duty and arrest of flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Police investigation report (35 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing victim photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: Obstruction of police officers’ performance of official duties: The favorable circumstances: one’s own misconduct, the fact that the defendant has no record of committing an obstruction of performance of official duties, the degree of violence committed by the defendant, the degree of damage inflicted by the victimized police officer.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow