The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (five million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant reflects the instant crime; and (b) the Defendant has difficulties in maintaining his livelihood; and (c) the circumstances favorable to the Defendant.

However, the defendant from August 30, 2014 to the same year.

9. Until April 2, 200, the instant crime with five female employees, who had no status of stay in D, was committed in the same place of business by regulating the fact that he/she was employed by one female employee, who is a solar nation without status of stay, and the summary order of KRW 2 million was issued on March 2, 2015 and confirmed on April 1, 2015, which became final and conclusive after the control, which was committed in the same place of business from September 14, 2014 to December 1, 200, which was disadvantageous to the Defendant.

In addition, considering the fact that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.