The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime; (b) the driving distance of a vehicle while under drinking is relatively short; (c) the criminal record was committed by a repeated crime; (d) there was no record of punishment for the same kind of crime after around 2004; (b) there was any family member to support the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant’s wife wanting to take advantage of the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, such as drunk driving; (d) even though there was a record of repeated driving; (e) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a) in particular, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; (b) the blood alcohol concentration level of the Defendant at the time was high to 0.241%; and (c) the other vehicle was driven while driving under drinking; (d) the lower court selected imprisonment with prison labor and then determined the age of the Defendant’s wife and the circumstances of the Defendant’s personality and behavior; (e.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.