The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Even if the judgment of the court below takes into account the following factors: (a) the defendant was under the influence of alcohol driving at least three years prior to the crime of this case; (b) he was under the influence of alcohol driving on June 201; (c) he was under the influence of alcohol driving at least three years prior to the crime of this case; (d) he was under the influence of alcohol driving at least two times prior to the crime of this case; (e) he was under the influence of alcohol driving at least four times; and (e) the defendant was under the influence of a fine at least four times; (e) the blood alcohol concentration level level was high as 0.152%; and (e) the vehicle parked while driving without the influence of alcohol was under the influence of alcohol; (e) the current Road Traffic Act does not prevent driving under the influence of alcohol driving that threatens the safety of road traffic; (e) there is no other reason to punish the person who violated the provision of prohibition of drinking driving at least twice, and (e) there is no reason to punish the defendant's vehicle more favorablely.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.