logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.10.16 2014나987
소유권이전등기 등
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. As to D orchard 7,530 square meters and E large 407 square meters in Seopopo-si, Seopo-si, the Plaintiff’s lighting net F, which was the father, completed the registration of ownership preservation in accordance with the Act on Special Measures, which was in force on August 16, 1913, and was in force on April 22, 1980.

B. Since G was subject to the assessment on August 16, 1913, G was transferred to H on January 26, 1918, to J on July 11, 1930, to J on March 24, 1962, to K on April 18, 1962, to L on October 14, 1987, to M on August 31, 1988, and to the Defendant on January 30, 203.

다. 위 D 토지와 인접한 위 C 토지 중 별지 도면 표시 ㅋ², ㅌ², ㅍ², ㅎ², ㅁ², ㅋ²의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ‘다’부분 지상에는 돌벽식 스레트지붕 창고 16㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 창고’라 한다)가 경계를 넘어 축조되어 원고가 소유하고 있고, 같은 도면 표시 ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅅ, ㅇ, ㅈ, ㅊ, ㅋ, ㅌ, ㅍ, ㅎ, ㄱ¹, ㄴ¹, ㄷ¹, ㅈ², ㅇ², ㅅ², ㅂ², ㅁ², ㄹ², ㄷ², ㄱ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ‘나’부분 토지 147㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 토지 부분’이라 한다)에는 경계를 넘어 돌담이 축조된 채 위 E 토지 지상에 축조된 주택으로 진입하는 통행로 등이 개설되어 있어 원고가 이를 각 점유 사용하고 있다.

[Recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (including each number), the result of the request for surveying and appraisal to the branch office of the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province headquarters of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the plaintiff's principal lawsuit and the defendant's counterclaim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the cause of the principal claim. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the Plaintiff’s ground of the principal claim, and as from August 16, 1913, the network F, which was the Plaintiff’s assistance in the instant part of the land, the passage along the Plaintiff’s network N and the Plaintiff’s intent to own from August 16, 1913, and the instant warehouse site.

arrow