1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the parties' claims are examined by adding the evidence submitted to the court of first instance to the

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance or supplementation of such judgment as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420

2. On May 10, 2016, the part of the second 7-9 of the 2nd 7-9 letter “A person was admitted to a hospital on May 10, 2016,” stating that “A person was exposed to a hospital on May 10, 2016, from around 00:00, while operating a taxi, the steering gear was exposed to one another, and the person was engaged in telephone conversations with the taxi engineer at around 09:00 on the same day, and the Plaintiff’s horses were divided into two parts, namely, “A person was admitted to the Hanam University Hospital with the aid of the taxi engineer at around 09:0.0.”

Part 2 of Paragraph 11, "the injury or disease of this case" has been changed to "the injury or disease of this case constitutes an occupational accident under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act."

From the second bottom to the fifth below, “the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as shown in the attached Form,” and the attached Form shall add “relevant Acts and subordinate statutes” to this judgment.

The evidence Nos. 3 through 9 of the 3rd 10-11 of the first 10-11 "A" shall be removed from "Evidence Nos. 3 through 9, 12 of the same 11 and each "this Court" of the 11th and 12 of the same 12 shall be applied to "the court of first instance".

From the last 3rd to the 4rd 1st eth eth eth, “the plaintiff has performed” parts are modified as follows:

After completing the above sick leave, the Plaintiff started to work from 00:0 on May 10, 2016 to 00 on the day before attending the hospital from 00:00 to 00 on May 10, 2016 (However, the Plaintiff’s certificate No. 9 of the Business Day A, and the Plaintiff’s duty to drive a taxi for about nine hours