logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2020.05.07 2019누12867
건축불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the parties' claims are examined by adding the evidence submitted to the court of first instance to the

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance or supplementation of such judgment as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420

2. The second 5th part of the content of dismissal or supplementation is to add “the purpose of transferring and expanding the above unauthorized livestock pens” later.

Part 2 of Part 10 "No. 4, 2018" shall be applied to " October 5, 2018".

The following shall be added at the end of the sixth session:

“Absent reasons” presented on the grounds of the instant disposition are merely invoked the decision of the civil petition conciliation committee in the official city, and cannot be deemed a legitimate reason and presentation of the basis pursuant to Article 23(1) of the Administrative Procedures Act. The fifth part of the 14th page of the 5th page of the “the location of the pipe of the upper-water water supply” is added to “(the application in this case is on the upper side of the water supply information.).”

Part 5 of the 5th page “ Any pension in operation” is added to “( approximately 300 to 500m distance from the place of the instant application).”

Article 14 of the Civil Petitions No. 6 of the First Instance “If the Plaintiff appears to be incompetuent,” the latter is added to the “If the part of the “incompetuent cause” stated in the instant disposition was invoked as it is by the Civil Petitions Conciliation Committee’s decision, but the Civil Petitions Conciliation Committee rejected the agenda newly built for the instant livestock shed by voting, but did not present the specific reasons such as the said disapproval at the time of rejection.”

The part of the 7th to 3th 6th am " shall be deemed to have been judged, and shall not be accepted as follows."

arrow