logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.12.07 2015가단229354
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Central Construction Co., Ltd.: KRW 102,672,288 and its related thereto from November 8, 2017 to December 7, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status of the parties

(1) The Plaintiff is an autonomous management body that is composed of occupants of Busan Jung-dong, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, 9 Meartz apartments (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

D. The Defendant Central Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) constructed and sold the instant apartment, and entered into each contract for the repair of defects (hereinafter “each of the instant warranty contracts”) with the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) on February 18, 2003, with respect to the instant apartment as the guaranty creditor as the head of Busan Metropolitan City, Jinjin-gu (hereinafter “the head of Busan, Jinjin-gu”) and was issued with each of the following warranty bonds.

The warranty number classification period of the warranty is 187,821,932 won from May 30, 2006 to May 29, 2016, and 187,821,932 won from May 30, 2006 to May 29, 2016 to May 29, 2011, and 187,821,932 won from May 30, 2006 to May 29, 2006 to May 29, 2006 to 375,643,862 won from May 30, 206 to May 29, 2009; 264 won from May 30, 206 to May 29, 2006 to May 29, 206 to May 29, 206; 205 won from May 26, 2004 to 264 won

Article 22(1) of the Civil Act provides that “The guarantee creditor shall be deemed to have changed to the council of occupants’ representatives if the council of occupants’ representatives is formed, and the guarantee creditor shall be deemed to have been appointed to the council of occupants’ representatives.” The guarantee creditor shall be deemed to have been appointed to the council of occupants’ representatives, and the guarantee creditor shall be deemed to have been appointed to the council of occupants’ representatives.”

x. On May 30, 2006, the defendant company obtained the approval of the use of the apartment in this case from the head of Busan Jin-gu, and thereafter the plaintiff.

arrow