Text
1. The plaintiff's incidental appeal and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed.
2. The costs of incidental appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff (around February 20, 2018, whose trade name was changed from the “A community credit cooperative” to the “U community credit cooperative”) is a nonprofit corporation for the purpose of credit business, such as the receipt of deposits, installment savings, etc. from its members, and the lending of funds to its members. The Defendant and the first instance co-defendant C, D (hereinafter “C”), and D (hereinafter “D”), as shown below [Attachment], have served or are serving as the Plaintiff’s officer or employee.
On October 23, 2016, the Secretary General of C on October 04, 1993, - currently in charge of D agency loans, 004. - October 01, 2004 - October 14, 201, 201, currently in charge of D agency loans.
The Plaintiff entered into each of the instant loan contracts: (a) the Plaintiff: (b) prepared an appraisal report appraised by D as follows; (c) examined the loan as a loan practical person; and (d) applied approval after deliberation and resolution by the loan deliberation committee; (c) as the head of the loan team or the working-level person; and (d) as the chief director, the Defendant granted a total of KRW 640,000,000 to E,F, and G in a manner where the loan is implemented after deliberation and approval.
(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant loans”). The appraised value of secured real estate (20.1.1.200), 50 square meters, 20.20 square meters, 30 square meters, 127 square meters, 830 square meters, 1,407 square meters, 336,000, 946, 370- - Of the increase of land prices for nearby power plants, - the additional plan to construct a kimchi factory - the additional plan to provide 00,000, 200, 200,000, 200,000, 200,000, 30,000, 20,000, 30,000, 20,000, 70,000, 70,000, -18,000, - 205,205, -67,005, -15,006,