On August 8, 2018, the Defendant revoked the disposition of non-approval for medical care granted to the Plaintiff.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 30, 2017, around 11:30, the Plaintiff (C) was a construction supervisor affiliated with D (hereinafter referred to as D) who performs supervision at the construction site where the fourth underground floor in Seodaemun-gu Seoul and the 26th floor corporate-type rental housing is newly constructed (hereinafter referred to as the “construction site in this case”), while performing the supervision at the construction site where the Plaintiff (C) was a construction supervisor affiliated with D (hereinafter referred to as “D), the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “C”) was diagnosed as being transported to the hospital emergency room by showing abnormal symptoms, such as cutting down the spos while performing the spores and spores and loweringing awareness while performing the construction site.

B. On January 19, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits for the instant injury. However, the Defendant rendered a decision to grant medical care on August 8, 2018 on the basis of the Seoul Decision to grant medical care based on the result of deliberation by the Seoul Decision Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “Decision to grant medical care for the instant injury”) on the following grounds: (a) the occurrence of a sudden and difficult incident or a sudden change in business environment related to the business that could deteriorate the illness, etc. of the instant injury, within 24 hours prior to the occurrence of the injury; (b) the occurrence of a sudden and difficult incident or a sudden change in business environment is not confirmed; and (c) the instant injury is not likely to increase the business burden for a short period to affect the normal function of the cerebrovascular before the outbreak; and (d) the injury in the instant case is presumed to have naturally caused the Plaintiff’s private life (such as a high blood pressure, urology, cronology, and al.).

C. The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit via a review by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The instant disposition is made.