1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 14, 1997, the Plaintiff’s husband B (hereinafter “the deceased”) is a person who was employed and worked in the light cooling and heating industry (hereinafter “instant company”).

B. On March 15, 2016, the Deceased finished night work on and around 21:10, and then left the instant vehicle by directly driving the instant vehicle on the vehicle supplied for commuting to and from the instant company (hereinafter “instant vehicle”). On the road located in Gangseo-gu Busan Gangseo-gu, while driving the road at the bottom from the airport direction, the traffic accident involving street lights on the said vehicle (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”) was caused by around 21:35, while driving the road in the direction of the airport direction.

C. On March 24, 2016, the Deceased transferred to a high-university uniform hospital through the 119 Emergency Medical Services Team, and as a result of the examination, the Deceased was diagnosed as “cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spony (hereinafter “the instant injury”). Around 03:30 of the death of the deceased.

A person directly in charge of the deceased’s death diagnosis is indicated as “cerebrovascular blood,” and the preceding person as “cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Space.

The Plaintiff asserted that there exists a proximate causal relation between the deceased’s death and his work, and claimed the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses. However, on May 27, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition of survivors’ benefits and funeral funeral expenses on the ground that “if determined by the Busan Committee on Determination of Busan Occupational Disease that it is not sufficiently confirmed that there is a significant causal relation between the deceased’s death and the deceased’s work, there is no proximate causal relation between the deceased’s death and the deceased’s work.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) e.

The plaintiff filed a request to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee for reexamination on the disposition of this case, but the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee.