A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 18, 2012, from around 17:20 to 17:50, the Defendant: (a) demanded that the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D located in Daegu-gu Seo-gu Seoul be a customer.

A victim, who was well aware of the fact that the Defendant her frighting around business establishments, did not drink to the Defendant, and the Defendant, who said frighting, had the other customers, obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force of 30 minutes, such as “I see whether I see, see, and in accordance with the same manner, I see that I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, and see, I see, I see, I see, I

2. On October 18, 2012, the Defendant, at around 17:50 on October 17, 2012, issued a 112 report and 112, sent back to the said restaurant, the Defendant saw that he continued to go home without complying with the victim F District Unit G (the age of 53) and the victim slope H (the victim slope 41)’s return home to the Defendant.

Accordingly, when the victim H notifies the Defendant that “it may be punished for interference with business affairs”, the Defendant expressed the victim H that “satis satis, satisfing, satisfing,” the part of the part of the victim H h’s hand with Defendant’s hand, and pushed the chest one time with Defendant’s hand, and the part of the victim G h’s hand with Defendant’s hand was satisfed one time with Defendant’s hand and pushed the chest two to three times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H, G, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of work place;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. From 2008 to 2012, the Defendant for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders is the same criminal act.