logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2012.06.13 2011고정1262
고용보험법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the representative of a non-profit non-profit organization of Ansan-si D(E), and the defendant A was working as a volunteer from the above D.

1. The Defendants conspired with the Defendants to commit the crime, and the Defendant B submitted a report of severance on November 2009 to the Mayang-si Office of the Republic of Korea Labor, and the Defendant A, on December 16, 2009, entered the fact in the above Ansan-si Office on the application form for recognition of the recipient qualification in his name without having worked in D, and submitted the application form for recognition of the recipient qualification in his name to the person in charge of unemployment benefits for a false statement on September 30, 2009, and received 2,592,000 won in total as job-seeking benefits for 90 days from December 23, 2009 to March 22, 2010.

2. Defendant B and F committed a crime in collusion with the volunteers F in the above workplace, and F entered the false fact at the Nanyang District Office around January 24, 201 at D, in the application form for recognition of eligibility for unemployment benefits under the name of the person in question, and submitted the application form for recognition of eligibility for unemployment benefits to the person in charge of unemployment benefits on December 31, 2010, although there was no fact that he/she had worked in D, and submitted the application form for recognition of eligibility for unemployment benefits to the person in charge of unemployment benefits on January 31, 201, and Defendant B submitted the departure report, etc. to the Nanyang District Office on January 31, 201, which believed that it was true, and received KRW 665,820,000 total job-seeking benefits for 36 days from January 31, 201 to March 7, 2011.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Partial statement of the witness A (as to the defendant B)

1. Partial statement of the witness B (as to the defendant A)

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application for recognition of eligibility for each benefit;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. The Defendants of the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and the choice of punishment: each of the Defendants is governed by Article 116(2) of the Employment Insurance Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act.

arrow